批注与建议流程
Comment & suggestion workflows
Resolve, reply to and apply suggestions in shared documents.
20 条本项目编写的提案 · 分类 v1.1 · 新增基准运行 0 次。下方验证方式与部分得分规则是设计,不是执行结果。
- 典型应用
- Google Docs · Word Online · OnlyOffice
- 小类 GUI 需求标签
G2· GUI 必要
任务提案 · 20
展开查看完整原文与建议检查方式;两种界面均保留提案英文原文。
R11.04.01.01-T01 Accept one reviewer's tracked changes and reject another's
原始指令
Open input/contract.docx in Word. Accept all tracked changes by 'Alice Chen' and reject all by 'Bob Ortiz'. Leave comments untouched and keep Track Changes on. Save as output/contract_reviewed.docx.
- 平台
mac· macOSwin· Windows- 应用
- Word
- 交互表面
desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
licensed· 授权专业软件- 提案难度
- 2 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse document.xml: no w:ins/w:del remain; body text equals gold (Alice applied, Bob rejected); comments.xml unchanged; settings trackRevisions on. Compared with control pair T17. Word VBA and COM/AppleScript automation are disabled and the agent has no terminal or Python; the file must be saved by Word (docProps app/lastModifiedBy).
建议部分得分
40% Alice changes applied; 40% Bob changes rejected; 10% comments intact; 10% tracking on
R11.04.01.01-T02 Answer and resolve comment threads in a shared Google Doc
原始指令
In the Google Doc 'Q4 Plan draft' (test account), 8 open comments ask questions. Reply to each using the answers in answers.md; resolve the 6 whose answers fully address the question and leave the 2 marked 'needs owner' open with an @mention of the owner named in answers.md.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击type· 文字与表单nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Drive API comments.list (verifier): each comment has a reply containing the gold answer key phrase; 6 resolved; 2 open with +mention of the right user; no other comments changed. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
40% replies correct; 35% resolve states; 25% mentions on open ones
R11.04.01.01-T03 Make edits as suggestions, not direct changes
原始指令
In Google Doc 'Services Agreement' switch to Suggesting mode and: replace every 'shall' with 'must' in clause 3.1 only, delete the second paragraph of section 2, and insert 'within 30 days' after 'invoice' in clause 5.2. No direct edits allowed.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
type· 文字与表单click· 指向与点击nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Docs API (SUGGESTIONS_INLINE view): suggestedInsertion/suggestedDeletion ranges exactly on gold targets; PREVIEW_WITHOUT_SUGGESTIONS body equals original (no direct edits); no suggestions elsewhere. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
35% shall→must in 3.1 only; 25% paragraph deletion; 20% insertion; 20% no direct edits
R11.04.01.01-T04 Accept typo fixes and reject changes to defined terms
原始指令
In Word for the web, output/policy_v3.docx has 34 tracked changes from two reviewers. Accept changes that fix spelling, grammar or punctuation; reject any change that alters a capitalized defined term listed in Definitions (section 1) or a number. Save.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Word Online
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击vis· 视觉判断nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 4 / 5
建议验证方式
Downloaded docx: no revisions remain; per-change decision vs gold (34): text at each change site matches expected; score accuracy, with defined-term/number changes weighted double. No Graph credentials or app registration are issued to the agent and Office add-ins are blocked, so edits must come from Word for the web sessions.
建议部分得分
45% typo/grammar accepted; 45% defined-term/number changes rejected; 10% no revisions left
R11.04.01.01-T05 Add anchored comments with mentions in OnlyOffice
原始指令
In OnlyOffice Docs (test server), open report_draft.docx and add comments on 4 ranges listed in comments_to_add.csv (exact sentence, comment text, user to @mention). Save.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)mac· macOSwin· Windowslin· Linux- 应用
- OnlyOffice
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击type· 文字与表单nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 2 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse saved docx comments.xml + commentRangeStart/End: 4 comments anchored on exact sentences, texts equal, mention markup for the right users; document body unchanged. OnlyOffice macros and plugins are disabled on the test server and the agent has no terminal or document-server JWT secret, so edits must come from editor sessions.
建议部分得分
40% anchors exact; 35% comment text; 25% mentions
R11.04.01.01-T06 Apply reviewer suggestions selectively by house style
原始指令
Google Doc 'Press release draft' has 22 suggestions. Accept those consistent with style_guide.pdf (Oxford comma off, numerals for 10+, 'per cent' spelled out, no title case in headings) and reject the rest. Then reply 'Rejected per style guide §x' on each rejected suggestion's thread with the right section.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击vis· 视觉判断type· 文字与表单- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 4 / 5
建议验证方式
Docs API: no pending suggestions; final text equals gold accept/reject outcome per suggestion (22); suggestion-thread replies for rejected ones cite the correct section numbers. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
60% accept/reject accuracy; 25% replies cite correct section; 15% none pending
R11.04.01.01-T07 Produce a redline by comparing two contract versions
原始指令
In Word use Review > Compare to compare input/msa_v4.docx (original) with input/msa_v5_clean.docx (revised), attributing changes to 'Counsel', showing changes in a new document with formatting changes included. Save the redline as output/msa_v4_v5_redline.docx.
- 平台
mac· macOSwin· Windows- 应用
- Word
- 交互表面
desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击type· 文字与表单- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
licensed· 授权专业软件- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse redline: w:ins/w:del authors all 'Counsel'; accept-all text equals v5; reject-all text equals v4; formatting revisions (w:rPrChange) present for 3 known format edits. Word VBA macros and COM/AppleScript automation are disabled by policy and the agent has no terminal or Python, so the docx must be saved by Word (docProps/app.xml).
建议部分得分
35% accept-all equals v5; 35% reject-all equals v4; 15% author; 15% formatting changes
R11.04.01.01-T08 Assign action items to people via comments
原始指令
In Google Doc 'Launch checklist', create assigned comments (comment with +email and 'Assign to' checked) on the 5 checklist lines named in assign.csv, each to the listed owner with the due date text, and reply to the existing comment from Priya confirming the plan.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击type· 文字与表单- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Drive API: 5 new comments anchored on the right lines, each with assignee = listed owner (action item) and due text; reply on Priya's thread exists. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
30% anchors; 45% assignees; 15% due text; 10% reply
R11.04.01.01-T09 Edit a document with tracked changes under a review author name
原始指令
In Word set the user name to 'Agent Review' (initials AR), turn on Track Changes, and apply the 9 edits requested in email_edits.txt to input/grant_narrative.docx (wording changes, a moved paragraph, a table cell update). Save as output/grant_narrative_AR.docx.
- 平台
mac· macOSwin· Windows- 应用
- Word
- 交互表面
desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
type· 文字与表单drag· 拖放nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
licensed· 授权专业软件- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse docx: all revisions authored 'Agent Review'; accept-all text equals gold; paragraph move recorded as w:moveFrom/moveTo; table cell change tracked; no untracked edits (reject-all equals original). Word VBA macros and COM/AppleScript automation are disabled by policy and the agent has no terminal or Python, so the docx must be saved by Word (docProps/app.xml).
建议部分得分
50% edits correct; 20% tracked with author; 15% move tracked; 15% no untracked edits
R11.04.01.01-T10 Merge three reviewers' copies and settle conflicts
原始指令
In LibreOffice Writer open input/handbook.odt and use Edit > Track Changes > Merge Document to merge reviewer copies rev_ann.odt, rev_bo.odt and rev_cy.odt. Where two reviewers changed the same sentence differently, keep the version per precedence (Cy > Ann > Bo). Accept the rest and save output/handbook_merged.odt.
- 平台
lin· Linuxwin· Windowsmac· macOS- 应用
- LibreOffice Writer
- 交互表面
desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动vis· 视觉判断- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
hidden· 隐藏 / 过期状态- 提案难度
- 4 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse ODT: no tracked changes left; text equals gold merge applying precedence on 7 conflicts and all non-conflicting changes; paragraph count matches. LibreOffice macro security is Very High with no trusted locations and the agent has no terminal for soffice --headless or Python UNO scripts.
建议部分得分
30% all copies merged; 40% conflicts resolved by precedence; 30% non-conflicting accepted
R11.04.01.01-T11 Re-anchor and answer comments orphaned by deleted text
原始指令
In Google Doc 'Research protocol', 5 comments lost their anchor because the quoted text was rewritten. For each, find the passage that now covers the same point, post a reply quoting the new wording, and add a new comment on that passage referencing the old one; then resolve the orphaned comments.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动vis· 视觉判断type· 文字与表单- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
hidden· 隐藏 / 过期状态- 提案难度
- 4 / 5
建议验证方式
Drive API: 5 orphaned comments resolved with replies; 5 new comments anchored on gold passages (quotedFileContent overlap ≥80%) whose text references the old comment; no other comments changed. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
25% orphans identified; 45% new anchors correct; 20% replies; 10% resolved
R11.04.01.01-T12 Work through counterparty comments on a contract
原始指令
In Word for the web, output/nda_counterparty.docx has 12 counterparty comments. For the 8 that request clarifications answered in nda_positions.md, reply with the position and mark resolved; for the 4 needing counsel, reply 'Escalated to counsel' and leave them open.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Word Online
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击type· 文字与表单nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Downloaded docx commentsExtended: done flags on gold 8; replies (paraIdParent) contain position key phrases; 4 open with escalation reply; body unchanged. No Graph credentials or app registration are issued to the agent and Office add-ins are blocked, so edits must come from Word for the web sessions.
建议部分得分
40% replies correct; 35% resolve states; 25% escalations
R11.04.01.01-T13 Resolve inline comments and apply requested edits in Confluence
原始指令
In Confluence (test space), page 'API Guidelines' has 7 inline comments requesting edits. Apply each requested edit to the page, reply 'Done' on each thread, resolve it, and publish the page once with version comment 'Review fixes'.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Confluence
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
type· 文字与表单click· 指向与点击nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Confluence REST (verifier): page body includes the 7 gold edits; inline comments resolved with 'Done' replies; exactly one new version with message 'Review fixes'. Personal API tokens are disabled for the test space and the agent has no Confluence API token, so edits must come from Confluence browser sessions.
建议部分得分
50% edits applied; 30% threads replied/resolved; 20% single publish with message
R11.04.01.01-T14 Restore one section from version history without reverting the doc
原始指令
In Google Doc 'Handbook 2026', section 4 'Remote work' was wrongly rewritten yesterday. Using Version history, copy section 4 from the named version 'Approved Sep' back into the current document as a suggestion, leaving all later changes in other sections intact.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动click· 指向与点击vis· 视觉判断- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
hidden· 隐藏 / 过期状态- 提案难度
- 4 / 5
建议验证方式
Docs API: accepting suggestions makes section 4 equal 'Approved Sep' text; other sections equal current revision before task; revision list shows no restore of whole document. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
50% section restored; 30% other sections untouched; 20% done as suggestion
R11.04.01.01-T15 Prepare a review package with editing restrictions
原始指令
In Word, prepare input/sop_draft.docx for review: restrict editing to Tracked changes for everyone, but allow the 'Quality' group to edit section 5 freely (exception region), set author initials display, and save as output/sop_for_review.docx. Then share to reviewers via a OneDrive link with 'Can review' permission.
- 平台
mac· macOSwin· Windows- 应用
- Word · OneDrive
- 交互表面
desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
licensed· 授权专业软件risk· 高风险 / 不可逆- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
settings.xml documentProtection edit=trackedChanges enforced; permStart/permEnd with edGrp for section 5 range; Graph: shared link role 'review' on the uploaded copy only. Word VBA and COM/AppleScript automation are disabled, no Graph credentials are issued and the agent has no terminal, so sharing must be done from the app.
建议部分得分
40% protection; 30% exception region; 30% review share
R11.04.01.01-T16 Respond to a reviewer while they add comments live
原始指令
Open proposal.docx in OnlyOffice co-editing (test server). A scripted reviewer will add 6 comments over 10 minutes while you are editing. Reply to each within 2 minutes, applying the requested edit when it is a simple wording change, and resolve those; leave strategic questions open with a reply.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- OnlyOffice
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
type· 文字与表单click· 指向与点击rt· 实时控制- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
interrupt· 中断- 提案难度
- 4 / 5
建议验证方式
Document server history: reply timestamps within 120 s of each comment; 4 wording edits applied and resolved; 2 strategic questions open with replies; no lost concurrent edits (reviewer text present). OnlyOffice macros and plugins are disabled on the test server and the agent has no terminal or document-server JWT secret, so edits must come from editor sessions.
建议部分得分
30% timely replies; 40% edits applied/resolved; 20% strategic left open; 10% no edit conflicts
R11.04.01.01-T17 Accept and reject revisions by author with a script (control pair of T01)
原始指令
Control pair of T01. Without Word, write revs.py (lxml over the docx XML) that accepts all w:ins/w:del by 'Alice Chen' and rejects those by 'Bob Ortiz' in input/contract.docx, writing output/contract_reviewed_cli.docx.
- 平台
mac· macOSwin· Windowslin· Linux- 应用
- Python
- 交互表面
term· 终端- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
CL· CLI 足够- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
CL· CLI 足够- 交互原语
code· 代码与命令- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
- 未声明
- 提案难度
- 2 / 5
建议验证方式
Same checks as T01 on the output; document opens in LibreOffice headless without repair.
建议部分得分
40% Alice applied; 40% Bob rejected; 20% valid docx
R11.04.01.01-T18 Adjudicate sixty suggestions from four reviewers by rules
原始指令
Google Doc 'Annual report draft' has 60 suggestions from 4 reviewers. Apply adjudication_rules.md: Legal's suggestions in sections 7–8 always win, Design's only for captions, numeric changes need Finance's matching suggestion, else reject. Leave a summary comment at the top listing counts accepted/rejected per reviewer.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击vis· 视觉判断nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
long· 长流程- 提案难度
- 5 / 5
建议验证方式
Docs API: no pending suggestions; final text equals gold outcome per suggestion (60); summary comment counts per reviewer match the gold decisions. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
70% decision accuracy; 20% summary counts; 10% none pending
R11.04.01.01-T19 Clean a redline for external release with Document Inspector
原始指令
Before sending output/spa_markup.docx externally, in Word: accept all formatting-only revisions, keep content revisions tracked, delete all internal comments (author domain @corp.test) but keep the counterparty's comments, and remove document properties and personal information via Document Inspector. Save output/spa_external.docx.
- 平台
mac· macOSwin· Windows- 应用
- Word
- 交互表面
desk· 桌面 GUI- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击nav· 平移 / 缩放 / 滚动vis· 视觉判断- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
licensed· 授权专业软件risk· 高风险 / 不可逆- 提案难度
- 3 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse docx: no rPrChange/pPrChange; content w:ins/w:del count equals original content revisions; comments only from counterparty authors; docProps core creator/lastModifiedBy empty and removePersonalInformation set. Word VBA macros and COM/AppleScript automation are disabled by policy and the agent has no terminal or Python, so the docx must be saved by Word (docProps/app.xml).
建议部分得分
25% formatting revisions accepted; 25% content revisions kept; 30% comment filtering; 20% metadata removed
R11.04.01.01-T20 Round-trip a client's commented draft through Google Docs and back
原始指令
Client sent input/client_brief.docx with 10 comments and tracked changes. Upload it to Google Drive and open as Google Docs, reply to each comment per responses.md, accept the client's tracked changes except two marked 'discuss', then download as output/client_brief_reply.docx so comments, replies and the two pending changes survive.
- 平台
web· 任意系统(网页)- 应用
- Google Docs · Google Drive
- 交互表面
brow· 浏览器- GUI 需求 · 任务设定
G2· GUI 必要- GUI 需求 · 普通权限
G2· GUI 必要- 交互原语
click· 指向与点击type· 文字与表单multi· 跨应用- 工作产物
WP01· 文档- 条件
multiapp· 多应用long· 长流程- 提案难度
- 5 / 5
建议验证方式
Parse output docx: 10 original comments with replies (threaded via commentsExtended) matching responses; exactly two tracked changes remain (the 'discuss' ones); other changes applied; body text otherwise equals gold. The test account has no OAuth client or Docs/Drive API token and Apps Script is disabled for the domain, so edits must come from Google Docs browser sessions.
建议部分得分
35% replies preserved; 30% correct changes accepted; 20% two pending kept; 15% round-trip fidelity
已有研究映射
当前映射未给此小类指定基准参考。